Objects

[Zarky]

While creating a map for events I've had problems with /npo, /dpo and /gpo aswell, so I thought of an idea..

Why not add a /dnpo command which will delete the nearest player object.

And a /gnpo command which will teleport you to the nearest player object to go to your created when you die or saved objects when you load them.

[looknoarm]

Yes this is really needed, it makes building POBs easier and its a pain in the ass with npo that it detects wrong object sometimes.

[Zarky]

You have /udpo dont forget that.

that way you can always get ur objects if u mistakenly stood in the wrong place

[Gears]

/dnpo command would work the same way as /npo. This is a problem especially with big objects as they have one "point" where it got detected by /npo. So if you see an object as it is the closest on your screen, the system will still detect the object which has it's "point" the closest.

[Zarky]

Yes, its meant to directly delete the nearest object at once instead of typing 2 commands to preform this

[Fat_Lobster]

do /so2 hover over object and then /dpo. same thing
and trust me, it wouldnt be that useful.

[Spraky_99]

About /dnpo : As rinu said , some players don't know about the /selectobject2 or /so2 command this helps u to see the object you want to and u can also edit it just my a click no need to /epo id etc etc its a really helpful command..
About /gnpo : its simple dude , /npo and /gpo id thats all its not a "really big" deal to write these two commands

I don't think these 2 commands are need -1 sorry.

[Zarky]

Dude.. /so2 and /dpo are still 2 commands, I only use /so2 to not type /npo and /epo

/so2 and /dpo are 2 commands

/npo and /dpo are 2 commands

/dnpo is a single command, and all u gotta do is go ontop of the object, if /dnpo didnt work in that particular situation, then dont use it.

In my part, i think /dnpo will save alot of my time in making pobs.

[Spraky_99]

Dude.. /so2 and /dpo are still 2 commands, I only use /so2 to not type /npo and /epo

/so2 and /dpo are 2 commands

/npo and /dpo are 2 commands

/dnpo is a single command, and all u gotta do is go ontop of the object, if /dnpo didnt work in that particular situation, then dont use it.

In my part, i think /dnpo will save alot of my time in making pobs.

You don't get what I mean , If you want to delete a picture which is placed right on the a wall or a fence u go near to the object and type /dnpo it would delete the fence not the picture (I have tried this, /npo gives me the ID of the fence not the picture) /dnpo would delete the fence and still you would lose the time to get the picture's id by typing /so2 and /dpo id so its all good , making a /dnpo cuz you are lazy to type the small 2 commands , I don't think this a really "good" reason.. and I voted already

[Zarky]

It would still help me alot, and that makes me think of something even better.

A /dpo and /so2 command should do alot better but would be hard to do.

[Robo]

Deleting one nearest object with 2 short commands isn't a pain, it's just you lazy.

Also if this command is made, it would just fail many times because you wont get which object you will try to delete.
I always use /npo and /dpo to delete it, and if the /npo was failed to pick the object i wanted to delete, i used /so2 and hover to the object and see at the label which show the id then /dpo it.

So, actually /so2 + /dpo is still better than this /DNPO (/npo + /dpo)
Even if you go to the top of the object you wont always delete the object below you, it will search for any nearest from X, Y, Z offsets. Also not all objects have the same "center point", if you create a weapon object like M4, it's center point is placed in its back so it can rotate so well when made as pickup, so what i mean is the center point of some object is the center area of the solid object. Using /so2 allows you to select object on its object area when the solid side of the object is hovered.

Don't tell me that "You have to /udpo again" after fail, this is pointless to have /dnpo as soon you have to type 2 commands in final.

So -1 for this.


Better suggest a command like delete all player objects in radius.